lasik surgeons

 

USAEyes is a nonprofit Lasik patient advocacy organization
USAEyes Lasik grant application.
How to Pick
A Lasik Doctor
۰ Certified Lasik Doctor
۰ Why Choose USAEyes
 
Certified Lasik Doctors
۰ 50 Tough Questions For
  Your Lasik Doctor
 
Ask Lasik Expert
۰ Lasik Q&A Forum
 
Lasik
Top Articles
۰ Lasik Results
۰ All About Lasik
۰ Lasik Cost
۰ Wavefront Custom Lasik
۰ Lasik Patient Survey
 
Lasik Alternative
Top Articles
۰ Monovision Lasik
۰ PRK, LASEK, Epi-Lasik
۰ RLE Lens Exchange
 

Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, Bookmark, etc. this page.

Add Lasik page to Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, My Favorites, Facebook, Ask, and others.

 

Lasik Doctors

 

Lasik Price and Quality Concerns Raised To Congress

House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee hears expert testimony.



WASHINGTON, July 18, 2006 -- The following is a transcript of the testimony of Ms. Ha T. Tu, senior health researcher at the Center for Studying Health System Change to the Subcommittee on Health of the US House Ways and Means.

My name the Ha Tu. I am a senior health researcher at the Center for Studying Health System Change, HSC. The HSC is an independent, nonpartisan health policy research organization funded principally by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and affiliated with Mathematical Policy Research.

With funding from the California HealthCare Foundation, HSC has conducted research on consumer shopping for health services, focusing on self‑pay services such as LASIK. These self‑pay markets are often held up as models for all health care markets. However, our research findings suggest that even for the simplest self‑pay services there are important barriers to price and quality transparency and the extent of consumer shopping is quite limited.

That is a point I would like to briefly summarize, our findings related to LASIK. These findings are laid out in greater detail in my written testimony.

LASIK is a procedure that offers ideal conditions for price shopping for several reasons.

First, LASIK is an elective and non-urgent procedure so that consumers have the time and the ability to comparison shop. Second, consumers can gather initial price quotes for LASIK by phone at no cost and little inconvenience. In this respect, LASIK is unlike many other services that require in‑person exams before any price quotes can be given. Finally, easy entry into this market by ophthalmologists has helped to encourage price competition.

Our research found that competition has helped to keep prices down in the LASIK market. The average price for the conventional LASIK procedure has declined by nearly 30 percent in the past decade after adjustment for inflation. However, this price decline has been much less steep than a casual observer would expect, given the pervasive ads that most of us have seen for LASIK for $299. In fact, the average price of LASIK in the past year was about $2,000 per eye; and only about 3 percent of LASIK procedures actually cost less than a thousand dollars an eye.

We find that most consumers, in choosing a LASIK provider, rely heavily on word‑of‑mouth recommendation from previous patients. This is true of consumers in all price segments of the market. While consumers of premium-priced practices tend to focus on quality and consumers of discount-priced practices tend to focus on price, word of mouth is the primary way consumers choose the LASIK surgeon whatever the price segment of the market.

We identify three major challenges facing LASIK consumers.

First, LASIK providers don't package their services in any consistent way when they quote their fees to consumers; and, as a result of this, it is extremely difficult for consumers to make accurate apples‑to‑apples price comparisons across providers.

Second, some LASIK providers have engaged in misleading advertising by making price and quality claims that regulators have found to be unfounded. Both Federal and State regulators have taken action against misleading advertisers, but violations have persisted in this industry, and regulators acknowledge that they don't have the resources to monitor all of the violations.

The final challenge for LASIK shoppers is that substantial quality differences do exist across providers. There are large variations in how thoroughly providers screen patients, what kind of technology they use, and what their outcomes are, including success rates and complication rates. These variations are all evidence that LASIK is not a commodity, although it is often talked about as a commodity.

To summarize, we find there are barriers to price and quality transparency in the LASIK market, and these help to limit shopping.

When we turn to other self‑pay services such as in‑vitro fertilization, cosmetic rhinoplasty and dental crowns, we find even less shopping taking place in those markets because of additional barriers such as the cost and effort involved in getting price quotes, and in some IVF and dental crown cases, there is urgency involved which precludes comparison shopping.

The full text of the hearings is available at Lasik Hearings.


Tags: , , , ,

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" TM

A few of the communities where Lasik doctors are certified by USAEyes :

Materials presented in this website are for informational purposes only and are not medical advice. See full Terms of Use.
Unless otherwise indicated, Copyright 1997-2012 © Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance, a nonprofit organization.
800/USA-Eyes - 800/872-3937
No images, graphics, or text may be reproduced in any media without express written permission.
USAEyes, CRSQA, Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance,
50 Tough Questions For Your Lasik Doctor, and Consider and Choose With Confidence are trademarks of the
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance
All Rights Reserved.